(**Update – After writing that, I couldn't stand my own hypocrisy, so I moved to this great little indie coffee shop in Kensington called “The Tea House”. And switched to green tea soy lattes. Wow, that sounded far less gay in my head. Oh well.**)
So, on the political front, Obama clinched the nomination, and Hillary (finally, though I wouldn't quite say graciously) conceded. After taking her time about it, she finally did throw her whole-hearted support behind Barack's campaign. Let's just hope that all of her slightly more... er, “devoted”, shall we say, supporters were listening. Though I still think that Hillary is the more qualified candidate, you can't argue with the popular vote unless you want rioting in the streets. Granted, I'm of the opinion that with the current situation the States is in, a little rioting wouldn't be a bad thing, though for reasons other than who is going to be the next president. What has happened to our capacity, as a society, for proper social unrest? The last time North America was embroiled in a conflict like this was Vietnam (and yes,I'm quite well aware that I'm very far from the first one to draw a parallel between the two, fuck off), but look at the differing climates. We're over five years into a completely unnecessary war. Hundreds of thousands of innocent lives lost, hundreds of billions of dollars spent, and an entire geopolitical region turned into a proverbial powder keg (the Middle East this time, as opposed to the Far East). The only significant difference between the two is the dark spectre of “The Draft”. If you believe for even one second that no one has proposed going down that same route in this circumstance, then you are very naive, my friend. Now, I know that being only twenty-four years young, my words and opinions carry only so much weight. I've only been alive to experience one of the wars that I'm referencing, as the other one happened about twenty years before I was born. I will be the first to admit that there is no substitute for having experienced it directly, and that all my knowledge of that particular period comes vicariously through research. Having said that, I've always believed that the point of history is that we LEARN FROM IT! Where are the student organizations? Where are the protests? Where are the marches on Washington? We have a worldwide rally on the anniversary of the declaration of war, and that's about it. That's one bloody day a year! (Excuse the pun) It's as if our capacity for radicalization has been replaced by an alarming predilection for impotent outrage. I mean, really, there are simply so many reasons to be angry. Just look at the two latest additions to the growing list of outright crimes that the current administration has blithely admitted to. First, the 'generals' scandal. A massive team of retired generals, all employed as supposedly non-partisan military advisers to the major media outlets, being very actively and deliberately fed false information (if not outright propaganda) by a specially appointed Pentagon task force, then spewing those utter falsities all over network television as fact. Anyone who dissented was immediately shouted down and, subsequently, “cut out of the loop”, though it is the only instance I've ever encountered where being cut out of a loop of bullshit is a detriment. These facts are in no way contested or circumspect. The administration has all but explicitly ADMITTED to it! Just to recap, we have a government that has admitted to actively running a malicious propaganda campaign, designed with the sole intent of keeping the American populace entangled in a war that it can't justify starting in the first place. Let that sink in for a minute. Then think about this: Bill Clinton, who was a great president, an extremely progressive leader, and most importantly, a peacemaker, got impeached for cheating on his wife. I'm not justifying the act, and I'm not supporting his choice, I'm simply pointing out the disparity of the punishment. Something that, really, would have had no effect on the populace, aside from perhaps the first presidential divorce, and he got publicly humiliated and bounced out of office. George W is directly responsible for the death of thousands of his own citizens, not to mention the cold-blooded murder of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi citizens, and this was all before he was elected to a second term!!! How have we come so far in only eight short years? Now, we have the latest development in this ongoing farce – Scott McClellan's new tell-all book about how he, as the most prevalent and prolific of the Bush White House Press Secretaries, was lied to and, as a direct correlation, lied to the media about the evidence for the invasion of Iraq. McClellan provides a multitude of instances and specific examples to illustrate his point, and does so quite thoroughly throughout the book. So throughly, in fact, that the US Supreme Court is currently debating whether or not to hold possible indictment hearings based on the evidence presented in the text. What's truly funny (or truly saddening/sickening, depending on your point of view) is that the White House's response to this has been to basically say that McClellan is a disgruntled employee, while not actually denying any of his claims. This basically amounts to fourth grade diversionary psychology. For example:
Fictional fourth grade teacher, who we'll call Mr. Hague -
“George, did you start that fight?”
Fourth grade George W. (who is astoundingly similar to present-day George W) -
“Well... yeah, Mr. Hague, I did But Scott tattled! He's a big tattle-tale!”
It utterly disgusts me, the sheer level of contempt this administration has gotten away with showing toward the American public. They've basically been standing up at the podium everyday, giving the entire world a great big “Fuck you!”, and doing it with a shit-eating grin. Mr McClellan himself is one of the most guilty of this particularly heinous sin. Having said that, it's better that he's come forth late than never. At least now, his testimony can still do some damage, as opposed to waiting until ten years down the road The next few weeks will tell us exactly what kind of damage, if any, it does. Especially with G.W. currently involved in (formerly) secret talks with the (US-installed) Iraqi government to provide immunity from Iraqi law to all US contractors and military personnel, as well as setting up fifty(!) permanent US military bases, and giving the US control of Iraqi airspace below 29 000 ft. What was that John McCain was saying about being “fine” with the prospect of the US in Iraq for the next 100 years? Hmmm, someone's been sharing secrets at the $5,000-a-plate dinner table...
Perhaps some of the cause of this surge of activist fervor (it's always there, I'm just feeling it extraordinarily strongly right now) has been the my increased consumption of all things mid-to-late 60's lately. I've been going back and listening to a lot of the early Bob Dylan again. Same with the Beatles. Music of a revolution. Immersing myself in the literature of the time – Kerouac, Ginsberg, Abbie Hoffman, Norman Mailer, etc... If I really wanted to get “deep”, which I don't particularly enjoy doing anymore, I would surmise that it is probably an extension of my own need for some purpose in this life. I'm still struggling to find my niche, my way with which to better this grand old planet of ours. Really, what man is truly a man who doesn't make the world a better place? Every time I think I have some insight, every time that I think that I'll finally be happy, the feeling of contentment only lasts about six months, then I get restless again. I'm in need of more of a challenge. Everything feels like a holding pattern, like I'm just putting in time, waiting for something to happen. There are few worse, more stomach-wrenching feelings in the world, than the feeling that you're wasting such a precious and finite quality as your own life. For those of you who are reading this but don't have me on the all-knowing Book of Face, I recently had the Latin phrase “Te Digna Sequera” tattooed on my right forearm. Translated, this phrase means “Follow Worthy Things”, and it also happens to be the motto of my family's crest, a fact which is at once both ironic and fitting. The reasoning behind getting my body permanently adorned with this, especially in such an obvious place, is to remind myself not to fall into my former “less-than-healthy'' lifestyle, and to mark a turning point in my life. In the two weeks since I had the words inscribed, I've been doing a lot of thinking about the true meaning of the words, and how I can go about fulfilling them. It's brought back to the fore a great many feelings that I thought that I had successfully buried. We really are amazing creatures, the multitude of ways in which we can delude ourselves. The sad part is that I'm doing rather well right now. I've got a more-than-decent paying job, one with bit of respect and great benefits. I'm getting (slowly) out of debt, and living a relatively metropolitan lifestyle in sprawling urban city. Yet it still feels like I'm simply waiting for the other shoe to drop. Life, by most standards, is going rather well, but it's still getting progressively harder to resist the urge to liquidate what few assets that I do have, pack a bag, and get on a plane to God-Knows-Where. Even with all the life-altering I've done in the past six months or so, it still doesn't feel like enough. It's a good thing that I haven't gotten my passport renewed yet. Though that's something I intend to take care of quite soon... Maybe the problem is that I've become a vagabond in the true sense of the word. Is it possible that I've actually lost my capacity to put down roots, to think in terms of anything other than transitory? I know that I've long since passed the point of compulsively keeping people at arm's length, even people that I care very deeply about. I've been living in Calgary for six months now but, aside from the casual relationship I'm in (and even that is a pretty loose term, especially lately), I still don't have anyone that I consider a “friend”. Sure, I've met a great many people since I've been here, and been on a great deal of extremely random adventures (and that is in no way an exaggeration) but, to borrow a line from Chuck Palahniuk, they're all “single serving friends”. When I do go out, 99% of the time I go out by myself. I've recently noticed that I feel no difference between being in a crowded pub or coffee house, or being completely alone. Yet I never feel “lonely”, per se. I'm not sure if this is a normal development or not. Actually, I'm quite certain that there is nothing normal about it, but “normal” is a term that really only applies to me in its most relative sense, if it even applies at all. Which I'm pretty sure it doesn't. Of course, “normal” is more or less synonymous with “ordinary”, and who wants to be ordinary? Two kids, a Collie, and a Colonial? Suburbs and minivans? Divorces, alimony, and alcoholism? Personally, that sounds like a fate worse than death. So, the big question is: What do I do about this? So far, no single answer has been forthcoming. Really, when you get right down to the heart of the matter, I suppose that it all comes down to how much you're willing to give up.
Wow. How's that for stream-of-conscious?
*** Update!! McClellan will be testifying!!*** Click here for details.

























